FACULTY OF FINE ARTS AND DESIGN
Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design
GEHU 204 | Course Introduction and Application Information
Course Name |
Fundamentals of Philosophy
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
GEHU 204
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
Course Language |
English
|
|||||
Course Type |
Service Course
|
|||||
Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | - | |||||
Course Coordinator | - | |||||
Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
Assistant(s) | - |
Course Objectives | To provide an introduction to the fundamental concepts and argumentative strategies of philosophy through an investigation of the question “What is a rational animal?” in relation to logic, epistemology, ethics, and political philosophy. |
Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
Course Description |
|
Core Courses | |
Major Area Courses | ||
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES
Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
1 | Presentation and overview of the course; discussion of how to begin philosophy by acknowledging that we have already begun. | Overview and discussion of a number of dilemmas and paradoxes. |
2 | Plato | Apology |
3 | What is an argument? The concepts of validity, truth and soundness. Types of justification; types of refutation: by parallel reasoning, counter-examples, reductio ad absurdum. | R. Fogelin, Understanding Arguments, pp 45-53 and pp. 405-433. |
4 | Fallacies of vacuity: circular reasoning, question-begging; fallacies of relevance: ad hominem, straw man, false cause, appeals to authority | Fogelin, pp. 477-405 |
5 | The Chinese Room Argument: Can Computers think? Discussion of artificial intelligence. | Turing, A., 1948, ‘Intelligent Machinery: A Report’, London: National Physical Laboratory; Searle, J., 1980, ‘Minds, Brains and Programs’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3: 417–57 |
6 | MIDTERM | |
7 | Introduction to epistemology | Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, Meditation 1 and 2 |
8 | Skepticism, sources of knowledge, methodic doubt, certainty as epistemic criterion, the cogito as first principle and model of | Descartes, Meditations 2 (contn’d) and 3 |
9 | Philosophy and science: the thinking subject as embodied being subject to the laws of nature. FIRST PAPER DUE | Janet Richards, Human Nature After Darwin, pp. 4-25 FIRST PAPER DUE |
10 | Evolutionary biology as philosophical challenge and answer to the question “What is a rational animal?” | Richards, pp. 25-51 |
11 | Determinism, freedom of the will, morality as a scientific problem and science as a moral problem | Richards, pp. 126-154 |
12 | Consequentialism (Utilitarianism) and Deontology: arguments and criticisms | Kant, pp. 274-281; Bennett, pp. 294-306; Bentham, pp. 306-312; Williams pp. 339-345; M. L. K. Jr., Letter from Birmingham Jail. |
13 | Moral Psychology and Perspectivism. | Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals, essays I and II. |
14 | The responsibilities and the problems of rational thought; the rational animal and the polis. | Aristotle, Politics, Bk. 1 1986-2000; Locke, 249-253; Bentham and Mill, 270-274 Levi, If This is a Man. |
15 | Week 14 cont’d. SECOND PAPER DUE. | Levi, Contn’d. |
16 | Final |
Course Notes/Textbooks | |
Suggested Readings/Materials |
EVALUATION SYSTEM
Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
Participation | ||
Laboratory / Application | ||
Field Work | ||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
1
|
35
|
Portfolio | ||
Homework / Assignments |
1
|
30
|
Presentation / Jury | ||
Project | ||
Seminar / Workshop | ||
Oral Exams | ||
Midterm |
1
|
35
|
Final Exam | ||
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
3
|
100
|
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | ||
Total |
ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
Study Hours Out of Class |
16
|
3
|
48
|
Field Work |
0
|
||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
1
|
0
|
|
Portfolio |
0
|
||
Homework / Assignments |
1
|
0
|
|
Presentation / Jury |
0
|
||
Project |
0
|
||
Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
Oral Exam |
0
|
||
Midterms |
1
|
20
|
20
|
Final Exam |
22
|
0
|
|
Total |
116
|
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||
1 | To be able to perform, execute and manage the various responsibilities and duties of an interior architecture and environmental design professional |
|||||
2 | To be able to recognize, analyze and integrate within their practice the particular local and regional needs and developments of their profession |
|||||
3 | To be able to communicate and collaborate with other individuals and groups on a national and international level within their profession |
|||||
4 | To be able to develop, integrate and promote independent critical approaches for their professional practice |
|||||
5 | To be able to understand the social and environmental issues and responsibilities of their profession |
|||||
6 | To be able identify, assess and utilize the most up to date research, innovations, trends and technologies |
|||||
7 | To be able to consider the national and international standards and regulations of their field |
|||||
8 | To be able to develop the abilities to communicate and present design ideas within visual, oral and textual formats |
|||||
9 | To be able to adopt a multidisciplinary approach to design on a national and international level |
|||||
10 | To be able to recognize their own strengths, and develop them within an environment |
|||||
11 | To be able to collect data in the areas of interior architecture and environmental design and communicate with colleagues in a foreign language |
|||||
12 | To be able to speak a second foreign at a medium level of fluency efficiently |
|||||
13 | To be able to relate the knowledge accumulated throughout the human history to their field of expertise |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
NEWS |ALL NEWS
Exhibition Design Workshop for Interior Architecture Students: Identity
Between March 20th and 22nd, the "Exhibition Design Workshop for Interior Architecture Students: Identity" curate by stage and exhibition designer Valentine Koppenhöfer
‘Augmented and Virtual Reality’ Impact on Interior Design
Izmir University of Economics (IUE) Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design organized the ‘Panel on Augmented and Virtual Reality (AR&VR) Technologies
IFI WID 2024 / The Growing Generational Gap: Improved Multi-Generational Future
36 Years of IFI World Interiors Day (IFI WID) The Growing Generational Gap: Improved Multi-Generational Future. Embracing your enthusiasm for interiors and the constructed environment,
IUE’s pride of the 'year'
Asst. Prof. Dr. İpek Kaştaş Uzun, faculty member of Izmir University of Economics (IUE) Faculty of Fine Arts and Design, Department of
GOOD DESIGN İZMİR WORKSHOP / UNLOCKING THE REALMS OF VIRTUALITY AND REALITY: RE-THINK, RE-ACT, RE-CALL
The workshop promises to be a compelling exploration of design's role in reconciliation, through the realms of virtuality and reality. This three-day
IEU @İZKİTAP Book Fair
Prof. Deniz Hasırcı from our department was on the book signing day of their books serial ‘’Sözlü Tarih Yöntemiyle Türkiye’de Mobilya ve
Intervention on a Stone Ruin / CESUGA School of Architecture + Sebastian Erazo + Stefano Pugliese
During the III International Conference on Timber 2023, our department lecturer architect Stefano Pugliese was invited to direct together with architect Sebastian
IAED at D2D (Design to Designers)
As a department we are very happy to announce that, IAED department the first highlighted department in D2D (Design to Designers) journal